![]() ![]() Then they either turn into members of group #1 (less likely), or move away from suspensions with the experience they gained (more likely). The typical hybrid with 32mm wide tires, ridden on the typical pavement-sidewalk-path is totally smooth and comfortable, more so than group #2 has any clue about until they get some miles under their belt. The suspension is oversold to them, by the sales guy or by the theoretical musings of their mental image of how rough/smooth they anticipate the street will feel. Group #2 consists of people who I believe often come to the bike purchasing decision with their calibration of what a rough or smooth ride is totally off, and biased toward what seems the technologically more appealing option. People who buy a bicycle and theoretically, in their mind work out some kind of vision that a suspension makes the ride better, more comfortable, or just seems more technologically advanced and therefore more appealing in some "more modern" kind of way. Whatever the reason, it is probably valid.Ģ. Riding on rocks, trails, body aches, numb wrists, aging body, etc. Experienced cyclists that have a specific need or desire that only a suspension addresses. I think there are roughly two categories of people who buy bikes with suspension:ġ. Suspensions are great, they're just not for me. For a casual user it makes perfect sense, and doesn't beat up the rider. This bike rides beautifully around town, soaks up all the ridges and garbage, and is easy to ride. I have a sneaking suspicion that, even though this bike is brand spanking new, I'll be getting something else in the near future.īut, I think that's the difference between people who like suspension forks and people who don't. I knew them going in, and figured that it wouldn't bother me much, but like so many things you just don't know what'll annoy you till you get out there and do it-I doubt this would have been an issue on a test ride (and it wasn't!). Having said that, I'm beginning to get irritated with the inefficiencies that come with a front suspension, particularly during an uphill run. I ride pretty much pain free, something that wasn't always guaranteed in the past. And I've discovered that the extra give certainly helps take the edge off the washboards that pass for roads and paths around here. And, since we get plenty of frost heaving here in the Midwest, there's an awful lot of trails that are just all broken up (I walk them regularly, and am well aware of their condition!). In the intervening years I've had a number of back issues, and I felt that the extra give would be useful (I have ridden bikes in the meantime, but not regularly). I recently took up riding again after a near 20 year absence, and opted for a bike with a suspension fork. Now if you have a GOOD suspension fork, you can adjust the preload to be stiff unless you hit the biggest, of pot holes etc. But if I'm leaving the road, I want suspension. ![]() The result of this breakthrough bar/grip combination is nearly a 30% reduction in peak hand pressure, which means more comfort and control) copied from Trek's website about the handle bars & grips. ![]() & can agree that for Urban riding, a good tire, plus a carbon fork, IsoZone handlebar and grips (Bontrager’s inForm Science of Comfort research to design the ergonomically shaped IsoZone Grip, then paired it with a handlebar containing an advanced elastomer insert to soak up road buzz. I go with the idea that a rigid front fork and oversized tires are the best choice for the city and can do just about every trail as well as long as you are willing to use a little finesse and reduce your speed.I've always heard the same thing, about leaving it in the locked position. For anyone on the fence regarding the benifits of a front suspension and considering using it in lock-out mode in the city - here's a direct quote from one of the tech reps at DT Swiss:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |